Comments on: Massage Research http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/massage-research/ Massage Therapy Research - The future of the massage profession. Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:42:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Sean http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/massage-research/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Sean Sat, 25 Nov 2006 00:50:21 +0000 http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/massage-research/#comment-101 I wouldn't completely write-off research for massage as you might be implying. While you are correct in your statement that results from research of massage might be difficult to replicate case-to-case in terms of repeatablity, one thing research does do often is weed out claims of "cure" or "remedy" where there often are none. The burden of proof always lies with the claims maker, therefore if it's true, let he/she prove it, lest, best to shut thy mouth. Also, important to remember that research comes in two forms: Quantitative analysis (usually proving a hypothesis or claim) is most known by the public, perhaps the type to which you are referring. While not as exciting, Qualitative analysis may not prove a certain claim of massage, but will show from an objective standpoint, all of the things that massage may have done for a subject group. Sometimes this type of research leads to some very interesting and unpredicted results (sometimes negative/sometimes positive). You are correct with one statement being that we need to be more credible. One way I often see masage therapists shoot themselves in the foot with crediblity is by the use of logical fallacies while explaining their profession to others (medical people or lay person). Appeals to Authority, argument from ignorance and argumentum ad populum are commonly used when we try to "prove" our massage to others. Because the logical fallacies used to prove our point(s) turn out to sometimes be true, it's a lot easier to use them than to do the work that's required using the scientific method. I wouldn’t completely write-off research for massage as you might be implying. While you are correct in your statement that results from research of massage might be difficult to replicate case-to-case in terms of repeatablity, one thing research does do often is weed out claims of “cure” or “remedy” where there often are none. The burden of proof always lies with the claims maker, therefore if it’s true, let he/she prove it, lest, best to shut thy mouth.
Also, important to remember that research comes in two forms: Quantitative analysis (usually proving a hypothesis or claim) is most known by the public, perhaps the type to which you are referring.
While not as exciting, Qualitative analysis may not prove a certain claim of massage, but will show from an objective standpoint, all of the things that massage may have done for a subject group. Sometimes this type of research leads to some very interesting and unpredicted results (sometimes negative/sometimes positive).
You are correct with one statement being that we need to be more credible. One way I often see masage therapists shoot themselves in the foot with crediblity is by the use of logical fallacies while explaining their profession to others (medical people or lay person). Appeals to Authority, argument from ignorance and argumentum ad populum are commonly used when we try to “prove” our massage to others. Because the logical fallacies used to prove our point(s) turn out to sometimes be true, it’s a lot easier to use them than to do the work that’s required using the scientific method.

]]> By: Paul Manley, MT, PDMT http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/massage-research/comment-page-1/#comment-100 Paul Manley, MT, PDMT Fri, 24 Nov 2006 22:13:57 +0000 http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/massage-research/#comment-100 Julie: I am not sure how to take your post. Are you for or against research? If we don't continue to forge ahead whether it be medicine or astronomy we will never advance or at the very least know when to change course for the better. As a therapist I am reading all the time on the benefits of Massage It is to my benefit as well as my patients. My value to them is as a good muscle person but also as a good muscle educator. Julie:

I am not sure how to take your post. Are you for or against research? If we don’t continue to forge ahead whether it be medicine or astronomy we will never advance or at the very least know when to change course for the better. As a therapist I am reading all the time on the benefits of Massage It is to my benefit as well as my patients. My value to them is as a good muscle person but also as a good muscle educator.

]]>