<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Websites &#8211; Frames and Free Hosting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/webistes-frames-and-free-hosting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/webistes-frames-and-free-hosting/</link>
	<description>Massage Therapy Research - The future of the massage profession.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/webistes-frames-and-free-hosting/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebodyworker.com/massage_blog/webistes-frames-and-free-hosting/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>You are correct Julie.  Building a website with frames is a poor way to go.  I read an intersting article about Seaarch Engine Optimization a few weeks back, and one thing it pointed out is that spiders can not see content inside of frames.  Any content inside the frame is not indexed on the search engines, so basically you lose in ranking.   The first example you showed was a great looking site, but I ran the URL on Sitereportcard.com and there are no listings of that site on any of the major search engines except through as listing on your blog
.
So it&#039;s another good example of how you can pay money for a great looking site, but it might as well be useless if no one can find it.

Take the SiteBuildIt 10 days of training and get a website that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct Julie.  Building a website with frames is a poor way to go.  I read an intersting article about Seaarch Engine Optimization a few weeks back, and one thing it pointed out is that spiders can not see content inside of frames.  Any content inside the frame is not indexed on the search engines, so basically you lose in ranking.   The first example you showed was a great looking site, but I ran the URL on Sitereportcard.com and there are no listings of that site on any of the major search engines except through as listing on your blog<br />
.<br />
So it&#8217;s another good example of how you can pay money for a great looking site, but it might as well be useless if no one can find it.</p>
<p>Take the SiteBuildIt 10 days of training and get a website that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

